Information
- Publication Type: Journal Paper (without talk)
- Workgroup(s)/Project(s):
- Date: May 2025
- DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2025.2489543
- ISSN: 1545-0465
- Journal: Cartography and Geographic Information Science
- Open Access: yes
- Pages: 18
- Volume: Number 0
- Publisher: TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
- Pages: 1 – 18
- Keywords: Digital 3D maps, landmarks, trees, user study, modeling, rendering
Abstract
Digital 3D maps created from digital elevation models (DEMs) cannot properly capture trees due to the 2.5D nature of the DEMs. Leveraging publicly available DEMs and orthophotos as the only input data sources, we present a fully automatic pipeline that models landmark trees. We conducted two crowdsourced user studies to evaluate visual appeal and scene recognizability using two different levels of detail of tree representations generated using our pipeline. Users found highly detailed trees much more appealing, and also easier and more trustworthy to recognize, with open-ended responses revealing key factors like realism, coherence, and tree shape influencing their preferences. However, the ability to recognize a location seems to depend more on the surrounding environment than the representation of the landmark tree in focus. We discuss the implications of these results for digital 3D outdoor maps.Additional Files and Images
Weblinks
BibTeX
@article{grammatikaki-2025-htr, title = "How to represent landmark trees in digital 3D maps? An automated workflow and user study", author = "Angeliki Grammatikaki and Johannes Eschner and Florian Ledermann and Oscar Argudo and Manuela Waldner", year = "2025", abstract = "Digital 3D maps created from digital elevation models (DEMs) cannot properly capture trees due to the 2.5D nature of the DEMs. Leveraging publicly available DEMs and orthophotos as the only input data sources, we present a fully automatic pipeline that models landmark trees. We conducted two crowdsourced user studies to evaluate visual appeal and scene recognizability using two different levels of detail of tree representations generated using our pipeline. Users found highly detailed trees much more appealing, and also easier and more trustworthy to recognize, with open-ended responses revealing key factors like realism, coherence, and tree shape influencing their preferences. However, the ability to recognize a location seems to depend more on the surrounding environment than the representation of the landmark tree in focus. We discuss the implications of these results for digital 3D outdoor maps.", month = may, doi = "10.1080/15230406.2025.2489543", issn = "1545-0465", journal = "Cartography and Geographic Information Science", pages = "18", volume = "Number 0", publisher = "TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC", pages = "1--18", keywords = "Digital 3D maps, landmarks, trees, user study, modeling, rendering", URL = "https://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at/research/publications/2025/grammatikaki-2025-htr/", }